Development of a Proactive Care Program (U-CARE) to Preserve Physical Functioning of Frail Older People in Primary Care
Select a nursing research article from the list below that includes a theoretical or conceptual framework and the exploration of a clinical problem. Identify the nursing research article components using the Week 5 research template.
Development of a Proactive Care Program (U-CARE) to Preserve Physical Functioning of Frail Older People in Primary Care
Emotional Work and Diversity in Clinical Placements of Nursing Students
Nurses’ Preparedness and Perceived Competence in Managing Disasters
Self-efficacy-based training for research literature appraisal
The template will be evaluated on the effectiveness of the discussion of the following components. If a component is not present in the article, its absence should be discussed.
- Identify the research problem.
- Identify the research purpose.
- Summarize the review of literature.
- Identify the nursing framework or theoretical perspective.
- Identify the research questions and hypotheses.
- Identify the variables.
- Identify and discuss the appropriateness of the design.
- Discusses the validity and reliability of the instruments, tools, or surveys.
- Discuss the significance of the study. Did it resolve the question?
- Discuss the legal and ethical issues of the study. Include the use of human subjects and their protection.
- Describe any cultural aspects of the study.
- Describe the final sample.
- Describe the procedures for data collection.
- Summarize the results including statistical analysis used or other method of analysis.
- Describe how the results of the research may impact future nursing practice.
- Apply the research to the student’s nursing practice.
- NOTE: If a component is absent, student receives a zero for that component.
Cite any resources in APA style and include a copy of the article with the submission.
Research Template
Name
Cite the article reviewed in APA style:
***In the template, any direct quotes from the articles needs to only include the page number.
| Week 5 Template | Check the correct method used in your article
Quantitative Qualitative |
| Identify the research problem | |
| Identify the research purpose | |
| Summarize the literature review | |
| Identify the framework or theoretical perspective | |
| Identify the research questions or hypotheses | |
| Identify the variables (dependent & independent)
and demographic variables |
|
| Identify and discuss
appropriateness of design |
|
| Discuss the validity and reliability of the of instruments, tools, or survey. | |
| Discuss the significance of the study; were research questions resolved | |
| Discuss legal and ethical issues of study; were
human subjects protected |
|
| Discuss any cultural aspects of the study. | |
| Describe the final sample | |
| Describe the procedures used to collect data | |
| Summarize the results including statistical analyses performed or other method of analysis | |
| Describe how results of research may impact future nursing practice | |
| Describe how research can be applied to student’s nursing practice |
W5A2 Rubric
| Unsatisfactory
1 |
Emerging
2 |
Proficient
3 |
Exemplary
4 |
Score | |
| Assignment Components | |||||
| Identify the research problem. | Identify the research problem that is relevant to nursing. However, the summary is too incomplete to provide a clear picture of the problem. | Identify the research problem that is relevant to nursing. The important details are provided, but overall the identification is incomplete. | Accurately Identify the research problem that is relevant to nursing. More details could have been used to support the identification. | Summary accurately Identify the research problem, the type of problem, and the definition given from the individual state. Specific details are used to support the identification. | [ Score x 3= 12 pts] |
| Identify the research purpose. | Identified the research purpose. However, most details are missing or inaccurate. | Identified the research purpose. However, details are missing or inaccurate. The summary did not show the relationship between the three articles. Details provided are vague and incomplete. | Identified the research purpose accurately, and connects points and relationships. Specific details are present, but more could have been used to provide better understanding to the reader. | Identified the research purpose topic accurately, and connects points and relationships. Specific, strong details are used in support of the explanation. | [Score x 3 = 12 pts] |
| Summarized the review of literature | Mentioned literature review however no connection made to link articles to problem/[purpose of the research article | Literature review was vague and wordy | Understandable and brief summary of only part of the literature review discussed | Clearly identified literature review and precisely summarized | [Score x 3 = 12 points] |
| Identified the nursing framework or theoretical perspective | Identified the framework or theory but details missing or inaccurate | Identified the framework or theory but details are incomplete. | Identified the framework or theory accurately | Identified the framework or theory clearly and accurately in detail. | [Score x 3 = 12 points] |
| Identified the research questions or hypotheses | Incomprehensible and completely inaccurate | Vague with some accuracy | Understandable but not clearly accurate | Clearly summarized and accurate | [Score x 3 = 12 pts] |
| Identified the variables (dependent, independent and demographic) | Vaguely mentioned variables however did not include category of dependent or independent | Defined variables but did not include category of dependent or independent examples | Defined variables and included category of dependent or independent however did not give examples of variables | Clearly identified and defined variables which included category of dependent or independent | [Score x 3 = 12 pts] |
| Identify the research design and appropriateness of design | Incomprehensible and completely inaccurate | Vague with some accuracy. | Understandable but not completely accurate | Clearly summarized and accurately described research design | [Score x 4= 16 pts] |
| Discuss the validity and reliability of the instruments, tools or surveys used in the article. | Vaguely summarized the author’s discussion of the reliability and validity of the instrument or tool or survey. | Summarized the author’s discussion of the reliability and validity of the instrument or tool or survey. A few general examples are provided to assist in the explanation of the instrument or tool or survey. | Summarized the author’s discussion of the reliability and validity of the instrument or tool or survey accurately. Examples are provided to assist in the explanation of each instrument. | Summarized authors’ discussion of instrument or tool or survey with precision and detail according to validity and reliability. | [Score x 4= 16 pts] |
| Discuss the significance of the study; were research questions resolved? | Ineffective or inaccurate discussion of significance | Discussion of significance is vague. . | Discussion of significance and resolution of the research questions is incomplete. | Discussion of significance and resolution of the research question | |
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
