module 10 written assignment concept map 2

/in /by

Your patient is a 52-year-old male with a history of smoking and alcohol abuse. He presents to the ED with complaints of “my skin looks yellow, my stomach hurts, and I feel nauseous”. He is taken to CT and a tumor near the pancreas is observed. It appears to be blocking the common bile duct. Develop a plan of care for the patient. Use the attached concept map.

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: Concept map: GI

Novice Competent Proficient
ORGANIZATION Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Disorganized or illogical format. Examples may or may not be linked or connected

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Minimally organized, logical format. Examples may not be clearly linked or connected

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

Well organized, logical format that provides examples that are clearly linked or connected

Feedback:

CONTENT & MECHANICS

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Minimal number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates marginal conceptual understanding. Information may not be clearly presented & flow through assignment. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or citations

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Partial number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates acceptable conceptual understanding. Information clearly presented & flows through assignment. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or citations

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

Contains appropriate number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates superior conceptual understanding. Information clearly presented & flows through assignment. Correct spelling, grammar & citations

Feedback:

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Concept map detail does not show pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. Excludes more than one disease if related

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Concept map shows limited pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. May overlook more than one disease if related (ex: renal failure secondary to HTN)

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

Concept map detail must show pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. May include more than one disease if related (ex: renal failure secondary to HTN)

Feedback:

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Subjective & objective data not included

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Subjective & objective data partially included

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

Subjective & objective data included

Feedback:

NURSING DIAGNOSIS

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Absence of NANDA diagnosis, or does not include ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Less than two NANDA diagnosis or may not include ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

Two NANDA diagnosis, including ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

Feedback:

NURSING INTERVENTIONS

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Less than 2 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Less than 4 but more than 2 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

At least 4 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

Feedback:

GOALS

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Less than one per nursing diagnosis. Not formatted as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Less than one per nursing diagnosis. Format as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

One per nursing diagnosis. Format as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

Feedback:

ORGANIZATION—

Levels of Achievement:


0.33
(4.71428%) points

Disorganized or illogical format. Examples may or may not be linked or connected

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Minimally organized, logical format. Examples may not be clearly linked or connected

1 (14.28571%) points

Well organized, logical format that provides examples that are clearly linked or connected

Feedback:

CONTENT & MECHANICS—

Levels of Achievement:


0.33
(4.71428%) points

Minimal number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates marginal conceptual understanding. Information may not be clearly presented & flow through assignment. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or citations

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Partial number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates acceptable conceptual understanding. Information clearly presented & flows through assignment. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or citations

1 (14.28571%) points

Contains appropriate number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates superior conceptual understanding. Information clearly presented & flows through assignment. Correct spelling, grammar & citations

Feedback:

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY—

Levels of Achievement:


0.33
(4.71428%) points

Concept map detail does not show pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. Excludes more than one disease if related

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Concept map shows limited pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. May overlook more than one disease if related (ex: renal failure secondary to HTN)

1 (14.28571%) points

Concept map detail must show pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. May include more than one disease if related (ex: renal failure secondary to HTN)

Feedback:

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS—

Levels of Achievement:


0.33
(4.71428%) points

Subjective & objective data not included

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Subjective & objective data partially included

1 (14.28571%) points

Subjective & objective data included

Feedback:

NURSING DIAGNOSIS—

Levels of Achievement:


0.33
(4.71428%) points

Absence of NANDA diagnosis, or does not include ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Less than two NANDA diagnosis or may not include ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

1 (14.28571%) points

Two NANDA diagnosis, including ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

Feedback:

NURSING INTERVENTIONS—

Levels of Achievement:


0.33
(4.71428%) points

Less than 2 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Less than 4 but more than 2 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

1 (14.28571%) points

At least 4 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

Feedback:

GOALS—

Levels of Achievement:


0.33
(4.71428%) points

Less than one per nursing diagnosis. Not formatted as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Less than one per nursing diagnosis. Format as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

1 (14.28571%) points

One per nursing diagnosis. Format as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

Feedback:

Name:Concept map: GI

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.